Archive for the ‘Campaign Finance’ Category


Veto session update: the campaign finance bill and health insurance reform

Monday, November 2nd, 2009
  November 2, 2009
Veto Session Update
 Campaign Finance

 

Veto session ended on Friday with two notable outcomes - campaign finance and health insurance reform.  First, we passed a campaign finance bill that now awaits the Governor’s signature.  Click here to read the bill.  Change Illinois and the Illinois Campaign for Political Reform deserve much credit for getting the Governor to veto the original bill and then negotiating this much improved campaign finance legislation.  According to Dawn Clark Netsch, a member of Change Illinois, “This reform measure, while imperfect, is a long time overdue and an essential first step toward a cleaner, fairer, more representative election system.” 
 
  1. Limits what individuals ($5,000), corporations/labor organizations/associations ($10,000), political candidates ($50,000), political parties (varies by race – $50,000-200,000) and political action committees ($50,000) can give during an election cycle to a campaign (and to political parties and PACs).
  2. Provides much greater transparency by moving from twice a year to quarterly reports for campaign donations and expenditures and requiring year-round  reporting within 5 days of all contributions $1,000 or more.
  3. Creates accountability for campaigns by requiring random audits and audits for cause of campaign committees and increasing fines for violations.
  4. Establishes a task force to evaluate the new campaign finance system and the need for additional limits in general elections and public financing.
The major point of controversy about the bill is that while it limits what legislative and party leaders can give to candidates during primary elections, it does not set such limits during the general elections (although they are still limited in dollars they can receive for general elections).  While I would prefer a bill that included limits on leaders during general elections, Iagree with the reform groups that it is a significant step forward and puts in place a meaningful system of campaign finance limits.  Limits on leaders during the primary elections should result in more competitive races as well (In 2008 only 10% of primary elections in both the Senate and the House were contested, compared to nearly 40% of the federal primary elections in Illinois). You might be interested in today’s column by Greg Hinz of Crain’s Business Chicago on this point.  (Click here to read).
 
Only with enormous pressure and public attention did we achieve this result.  We must redouble our efforts to achieve further reform.  I am working with the campaign finance reform groups to file a bill that would limit what leaders can give during general elections, since I believe these limits are important.  We must also focus quickly on redistricting if we want to impact the redistricting process that will occur in 2011.
 
Health Insurance Reform
During the veto session we also sent a health insurance reform bill – HB3923 - to the Governor to sign.  Click here to read the bill. Representative Greg Harris, the House sponsor, Mike McRaith, the Director of Insurance, and I, the Senate sponsor, negotiated this bill with consumer advocates, small business organizations, and insurance companies.  The bill:
 
1. Establishes an expedited external appeal process when insurance companies deny coverage to a policy holder and broadens the Department of Insurance’s authority to reverse rejections;
 
2. Makes it easier for small business to shop for health insurance coverage by replacing the current hodgepodge of forms with a uniform application that all insurance companies must use; and
 
3.  Requires insurance companies to place more information on line every six months, enabling consumers to see how their premiums are being spent.
 
As Mike Lawrence, retired director of the Paul Simon Public Policy Institute, notes, “through a series of often frustrating but ultimately fruitful negotiations, they fashioned and advanced legislation to empower consumers, cut paperwork for small business owners and bring more transparency to the insurance industry without the aggressive regulation it feared.”  I look forward to the Governor signing the bill.
 
Please let me know if you have a question on either of these - or any other - issue.  I welcome your feedback.
 
Best,
 

Heather Steans


MAP Grant funding, campaign finance reform and recent awards

Monday, October 19th, 2009
October 19, 2009
 

Dear neighbor,

This update provides an overview of what happened in Springfield this last week, or first week of veto session.   I will also be on Chicago Tonight at 7PM on WTTW Channel 11 tonight to further discuss the happenings in Springfield with other legislators if you’d like to tune in to the show.

Monetary Assistant Program (MAP) Grant Funding

The General Assembly appropriated $200 million in additional funding to fully fund MAP
grants last week and the Governor signed this bill yesterday.  The bill authorized the Governor to borrow from other state funds to provide revenue for this program.  I voted YES on funding for MAP Grants.  I am still very concerned about the long term funding for MAP grants and will continue to work to make sure there is a secure revenue source for this program.

Campaign Finance Reform

Thanks for the many responses regarding campaign finance reform legislation.  A great number of you wrote to me about your support for meaningful limits on leadership transfers.  These limits are part of ongoing negotiations between the legislative leaders and reform groups.  I am hopeful that there will be some meaningful limits in the final legislation that we consider, and I will keep you posted.

Illinois Coalition Against Handgun Violence Awards

Today, I won a Legislative Advocacy Award from the Illinois Coalition Against Handgun Violence for my work on HB3991.  This law revokes or denies a Firearm Owner’s Identification Card when a person is subject to an order of protection and was signed by the Governor in August.  I am honored to have been able to work on this legislation and to receive this award from the ICHV.  You can read more about the bill by clicking here.  There is much work to be done to provide sensible handgun control legislation and provide safe communities for our youth.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.  Best regards,

Heather Steans


My vote YES to campaign finance reform legislation

Tuesday, October 13th, 2009

Dear Friend,

With the Fall Veto Session starting tomorrow, I wanted to provide you with an update on campaign finance reform legislation and seek your advice on how to maximize our reform efforts.

Illinois continues to struggle to enact campaign finance reform legislation that will reduce the destructive, controlling special interests in Springfield even though other states have models we could follow.  Much of this Veto Session will be spent improving the campaign finance legislation that Governor Quinn recently vetoed.

The good news is that the negotiations for a Bill begin at a better point than the legislation we passed last Spring.  It provides limits on what individuals and special interests can contribute to a campaign, and does not have a proliferation of political action committees that existed in the previous bill.  I voted for the campaign reform package last Spring – although I had a stronger campaign finance bill that I preferred – based on the belief that we needed to pass some campaign finance structure to keep this issue alive (Illinois is one of 4 states that has no limits of any kind in place).

The sticking point now is that there is no limit on what leaders and political parties can contribute to candidates.  This outcome consolidates power among a few leaders in an environment where our leaders already have a great deal of authority.

My goal is to achieve the strongest campaign ethics legislation possible including much greater limits on what leadership can give to their members. 

I have three basic choices:

  1. Encourage negotiations and support the best result with or without leader limits.
  2. Only vote for the Bill if it includes meaningful limits on leadership transfers.
  3. Only support the Bill if reform groups endorse it.

I welcome and appreciate your views and suggestions about this critical issue.
 
Heather